18.10.06
eye four one
i for one and 1-40: an odyssey of roadstops and sport toad (almost) they are making a documentary about making frivolous documentaries i think this is actually a good idea i have chosen my topic i believe in america and final cut pro these two things are important as a conceptual gesture i will edit on imovie because i am a prole on parole have you heard about the beat pill: no periods! that shit was amazing. ok, we're back. no joke, though, i am writing a blog about making a movie which is about other makers making blogs and movies based on books which are blogged about by music critics who each have bands each of which deserve hands when someone says they are freestyling i never have any idea what that means. note: narc with apple: iDEA. i as prefix is new mc as prefix which was new -owitz or -stein as suffix. idonalds? ijob? job is also a popular suffix. three words to describe the uninspired new cafe on avenue g: "french, nouvelle, vague."
13.10.06
first day in a certain way
lowest com denom screen. the wild can txt now. the most general thing that i can think of.
here is a trick, if you know it, tell me:
854-91-7632
similarly: (hint)
friday monday saturday sunday thursday tuesday wednesday
moving on.org: psych stress plus selective memory accounted for jeez's disinterest in the crossword.
why a TOO? a good question. question: can one spell tooth without too? no. to? also no. gum? i would like a gum, thank you. how much is the gum's cost? for a pack of five gums the cost is less than one small candy bar. that seems like a real deal. it really is. who (per cap) uses "reel deal" "reel life" "keep it reel" more often: cinephiles/etcs (film types) or finephiles/etc (fish types)? to be spiral-bound! to be hoodwinked! these are not questions, but they deserve answers.
this is the new blog and it is very famous and well-celebrated. to say people like it is an understatement on par with "i liked that film we watched together" or "this was fun, thank you" or even "yes, that was definitely fun together-being"
here is a trick, if you know it, tell me:
854-91-7632
similarly: (hint)
friday monday saturday sunday thursday tuesday wednesday
moving on.org: psych stress plus selective memory accounted for jeez's disinterest in the crossword.
why a TOO? a good question. question: can one spell tooth without too? no. to? also no. gum? i would like a gum, thank you. how much is the gum's cost? for a pack of five gums the cost is less than one small candy bar. that seems like a real deal. it really is. who (per cap) uses "reel deal" "reel life" "keep it reel" more often: cinephiles/etcs (film types) or finephiles/etc (fish types)? to be spiral-bound! to be hoodwinked! these are not questions, but they deserve answers.
this is the new blog and it is very famous and well-celebrated. to say people like it is an understatement on par with "i liked that film we watched together" or "this was fun, thank you" or even "yes, that was definitely fun together-being"
10.10.06
go forth
something about this a post and my thoughts this morning are directed towards concepts of individuation and totalitarianism, such that the next totality knows your favorite album and can even recommend your next summer jam (a vague reggaeton idm hit called algorhythm). it's a funny thing we've got going here, the age of hyperindividuation and megachurches, etc, etc. what else are we learning today? we are learning about mustards and the living room, electrelane and the ninja turtles.
9.10.06
steven
when esteban remarks yesterday that "time is a funny thing" i want to throttle him for his insolence. of course time is a funny thing! comedy is all about timing. to say that esteban is an idiot would be like esteban saying that he himself is an idiot: of course he is, what a boring thing to talk about!
8.10.06
to second
"a tour de farce." stars, sun, stars. i think i might even prefer to be called 'boy' (not boyee) than 'son,' with its sly undie pretension.
brunch was the first fusion cuisine.
brinner was the first failed fusion cuisine.
yul brenner and ben brenner who i knew when i was in sixth (?) grade and maybe also seventh (?) but never even close to well perhaps there are too many memories churning up chortling about chalking up to etc etc famous joke births new jokes through its pervasiveness. to wit: the reason the chicken crossed the road was because --there was either a tv skit or an avant garde t-shirt or maybe i just thought of the joke in which [[[ 0 (egg) (looking unfulfilled) says to & (chicken) (asleep with cigarette and bliss look) 'guess that settles that!' ]]]-- etc, etc we all know where this is going (the subversion then being the point i was trying to make before the dirty joke jumped in). anyway, is it a remnant from the bucolic idyll that chickens are such famous jokes? i feel like i almost never hear jokes about the future.
the biggest question of course is: "why is there something instead of nothing?"
the biggest answer is of course: "there is something instead of nothing"
highlighting the import of punctuation!
i heard that there was that whole lobby to get ! & @ to switch places, so that @ would be located @ 1 and ! would move 2 two. apparently the email folks thought that this was important. & had to add his $.02 (the c + | symbol having been driven out by rising property values, gentrification, that sort of thing) to the argument saying that the middle was better anyhow (graciously thanked livejournal and the letters "y & r" for their help in the resurrection of the am/s& [[/=per]sorry if this is getting a little too mush]). of course % brought up the interesting statistic that while being towards the middle of the board might seem an advantage, unlike retail, email is not all about location location location.** i had heard from the same source that there was a feminist (4th wave) critique of . as dot vs . as period. i then read a 3rd wave response which doubted the validity of this newer wave and its reversion to body as principle node for mode. a real bizarro to be sure.
**this story will continue later (more like a s=? or maybe just an = or perhaps who knows who knows a pr= to show the strange hebraic reversion to a reverso-chron that blog-reading engenders. note: this is a great idea.
brunch was the first fusion cuisine.
brinner was the first failed fusion cuisine.
yul brenner and ben brenner who i knew when i was in sixth (?) grade and maybe also seventh (?) but never even close to well perhaps there are too many memories churning up chortling about chalking up to etc etc famous joke births new jokes through its pervasiveness. to wit: the reason the chicken crossed the road was because --there was either a tv skit or an avant garde t-shirt or maybe i just thought of the joke in which [[[ 0 (egg) (looking unfulfilled) says to & (chicken) (asleep with cigarette and bliss look) 'guess that settles that!' ]]]-- etc, etc we all know where this is going (the subversion then being the point i was trying to make before the dirty joke jumped in). anyway, is it a remnant from the bucolic idyll that chickens are such famous jokes? i feel like i almost never hear jokes about the future.
the biggest question of course is: "why is there something instead of nothing?"
the biggest answer is of course: "there is something instead of nothing"
highlighting the import of punctuation!
i heard that there was that whole lobby to get ! & @ to switch places, so that @ would be located @ 1 and ! would move 2 two. apparently the email folks thought that this was important. & had to add his $.02 (the c + | symbol having been driven out by rising property values, gentrification, that sort of thing) to the argument saying that the middle was better anyhow (graciously thanked livejournal and the letters "y & r" for their help in the resurrection of the am/s& [[/=per]sorry if this is getting a little too mush]). of course % brought up the interesting statistic that while being towards the middle of the board might seem an advantage, unlike retail, email is not all about location location location.** i had heard from the same source that there was a feminist (4th wave) critique of . as dot vs . as period. i then read a 3rd wave response which doubted the validity of this newer wave and its reversion to body as principle node for mode. a real bizarro to be sure.
**this story will continue later (more like a s=? or maybe just an = or perhaps who knows who knows a pr= to show the strange hebraic reversion to a reverso-chron that blog-reading engenders. note: this is a great idea.
7.10.06
to begin
you go pro and ill go con
on the topic of stitution
strange to write a joke or whatever that might be termed and all of a sudden be faced with an poethical dilemma. is there an inherent division (or even relationship) between constitution and prostitution? would this be a worthwhile pro/con debate to take out of (limited) context of an 18 second song?
"xmarxthespotx" is something i would have liked to have thought of during a more m.o.c. phase of my life.
no matter: this was the problem with black holes.
i feel like i am a part of an improv revue called 'morning' in which the first rule is that i can't have coffee even though i want some and then i have some but haven't have enough yet.
am i antistitution?
what constitutes a prostitute within the institute? is it better to be destitute than accept a substitute as restitute?
on the topic of stitution
strange to write a joke or whatever that might be termed and all of a sudden be faced with an poethical dilemma. is there an inherent division (or even relationship) between constitution and prostitution? would this be a worthwhile pro/con debate to take out of (limited) context of an 18 second song?
"xmarxthespotx" is something i would have liked to have thought of during a more m.o.c. phase of my life.
no matter: this was the problem with black holes.
i feel like i am a part of an improv revue called 'morning' in which the first rule is that i can't have coffee even though i want some and then i have some but haven't have enough yet.
am i antistitution?
what constitutes a prostitute within the institute? is it better to be destitute than accept a substitute as restitute?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
