to second

"a tour de farce." stars, sun, stars. i think i might even prefer to be called 'boy' (not boyee) than 'son,' with its sly undie pretension.

brunch was the first fusion cuisine.
brinner was the first failed fusion cuisine.
yul brenner and ben brenner who i knew when i was in sixth (?) grade and maybe also seventh (?) but never even close to well perhaps there are too many memories churning up chortling about chalking up to etc etc famous joke births new jokes through its pervasiveness. to wit: the reason the chicken crossed the road was because --there was either a tv skit or an avant garde t-shirt or maybe i just thought of the joke in which [[[ 0 (egg) (looking unfulfilled) says to & (chicken) (asleep with cigarette and bliss look) 'guess that settles that!' ]]]-- etc, etc we all know where this is going (the subversion then being the point i was trying to make before the dirty joke jumped in). anyway, is it a remnant from the bucolic idyll that chickens are such famous jokes? i feel like i almost never hear jokes about the future.

the biggest question of course is: "why is there something instead of nothing?"
the biggest answer is of course: "there is something instead of nothing"
highlighting the import of punctuation!

i heard that there was that whole lobby to get ! & @ to switch places, so that @ would be located @ 1 and ! would move 2 two. apparently the email folks thought that this was important. & had to add his $.02 (the c + | symbol having been driven out by rising property values, gentrification, that sort of thing) to the argument saying that the middle was better anyhow (graciously thanked livejournal and the letters "y & r" for their help in the resurrection of the am/s& [[/=per]sorry if this is getting a little too mush]). of course % brought up the interesting statistic that while being towards the middle of the board might seem an advantage, unlike retail, email is not all about location location location.** i had heard from the same source that there was a feminist (4th wave) critique of . as dot vs . as period. i then read a 3rd wave response which doubted the validity of this newer wave and its reversion to body as principle node for mode. a real bizarro to be sure.

**this story will continue later (more like a s=? or maybe just an = or perhaps who knows who knows a pr= to show the strange hebraic reversion to a reverso-chron that blog-reading engenders. note: this is a great idea.